John Derbyshire, a British-American conservative author and columnist for the National Review, has written a new book titled We Are Doomed: Reclaiming Conservative Pessimism. The book contains a section called ?The Case Against Female Suffrage.? Yesterday on his radio show, Alan Colmes asked Derbyshire to articulate his argument.
?What is the case against female suffrage?? Colmes asked. ?The conservative case against it is that women lean hard to the left,? Derbyshire responded nonsensically. ?They want someone to nurture, they want someone to help raise their kids, and if men aren?t inclined to do it ? and in the present days, they?re not much ? then they?d like the state to do it for them.?
Colmes then pressed Derbyshire on whether women should have the right to vote. ?Ah?? Derbyshire sighed, attempting to dodge the question initially. ?I?m not putting forward a political program here,? he said. But then Derbyshire slowly began to open up:
DERBYSHIRE: Among the hopes that I do not realistically nurse is the hope that female suffrage will be repealed. But I?ll say this ? if it were to be, I wouldn?t lose a minute?s sleep.
COLMES: We?d be a better country if women didn?t vote?
DERBYSHIRE: Probably. Don?t you think so?
COLMES: No, I do not think so whatsoever.
DERBYSHIRE: Come on Alan. Come clean here [laughing].
COLMES: We would be a better country? John Derbyshire making the statement, we would be a better country if women did not vote.
DERBYSHIRE: Yeah, probably.
Derbyshire reasoned that we ?got along like that for 130 years.? Colmes countered by asking if he also wants to bring back slavery. No, Derbyshire responded, ?I?m in favor of freedom personally.? Colmes noted that freedom didn?t extend to women?s right to vote, however. Derbyshire said, ?Well, they didn?t and we got along ok.? Listen here:
Later in the interview, Derbyshire said there?s also a case to be made for repealing the 1964 Civil Rights Act because you ?shouldn?t try to force people to be good.?